rwestall1
07-25-2003, 07:23 AM
Hey all,
Let me quickly sidestep the whole "shouldn't a teasing and denial story just end as a tease" debate by saying, different strokes for different folks. I'm sure others have equally valid reasons for ending their stories with the male in torment, but right now, I'm just interested in discussing stories that end with the male getting to come.
Maybe that seeming conflict between teasing, and letting someone get off is what makes so many of the excellent stories I've read on this site often seem like letdowns.Obviously, I'm not posting and reading here because my idea of a good fuck is 20 minutes of activity composed of vanilla foreplay, followed by precisely timed simultaneous orgasm, accomplished missionary style, but I PERSONALLY think that teasing stories, on average, would be better if they end with orgasm. Let's be honest -- why do 99% of the readers and writers of these stories read and write, if not to get off eventually...Yes, I recognize a lot of people really do prefer a maximally teased and orgasm free lifestyle, and again, I commend those who actually attain such goals, but for most of us mere mortals, we settle somewhere in between. (Again, that last sentence was in no way mocking -- I really do admire people who do extreme denial, I'm just saying that most people just don't have the time or energy or singlemindedness to get it done).
Okay, I'm getting off topic here, and doing exactly what i was trying to avoid -- debating about which type of story is better, though in my defense , all I'm putting out there are my own preferences. Just like I'm staunchly hetero, but one of the happiest days in my life was that recent supreme court decision that overturned sodomy laws...(and not just because I want another reason to encourage my girlfriend to have more equal opportunity anal sex)...Again, trying to avoid flaming, not start it....so...
Back to relevancy. Often, the best tease stories that keep me on the edge of my chair throguhout the long and delicious teasing phase, just sputter out when they finally come to the cumming phase. Maybe by the time you write all that buildup, the climax seems like an anticlimax. Or, maybe the best tease writers, are by necessity, mediocre when it comes to rendering the money scene, if you will, because they're so tease-oriented. To some degree, I also found the opposite to be true -- some of the least tease-heavy, but still tease-oriented stories I've read, have the most elaborate and well-written cum scenes.
Say every human is on a sexual spectrum -- on one end you have the pure denial folk, who'd really be happiest never cumming at all, and on the other end, the people who'd hump a piece of drywall in front of a hundred people to come one minute faster. If you're reading this, you, like me, probably know which end of the spectrum you fall on, and it ain't drywall humpin' (apologies to any genuine drywall fetishists out there). It makes sense that story writers would have to be better at the buildup or the finish, right?
For me, it seems like an excellent argument for collaboration between differently oriented writers (not seriously, but worth a shot, right)? Or maybe, there just aren't that many ways to convey massive quantities of sperm being expelled some enormous distance for a VERY long time, yadda yadda...so, in the interests of story enrichment as public service (mainly playing to some of my own kinks a bit), let me toss a few of my own ideas out there...to some degree, they don't fall completely within the "end with a whimper" or "end with a bang" categories -- a middle road, if you will...and of course, feel free to incorporate whatever you want into your own stories...
Since you're probably not going for 100% realism anyway, why not
-Allow the male to start ejaculating, but only a drop/short spurt at a time. To clarify, I realize that a lot of the stories I've read do this as a form of teasing anyway, but what I'm discussing is different. Usually, done as in-story teasing, this means the guy is allowed to spurt a bit, then completely shut down until he stops trying to ejaculate.
In my finale scenario, it's more of a "shake the soda bottle, cover with thumb, release momentarily, cover, release, and repeat scenario," so that an orgasm still occurs and lots of semen gets discharged.
This allows the possiblility of really, really drawn out orgasms (story-wise, I mean -- try at your own risk in real life), that are still tease-torture in a way, while pleasurable (if you want) for your 'hero.' If you want to play it another way, maybe the teaser lets out just enough semen each time, so the amount produced by the (presumably) oversexed and super-horny male in that time, is just enough to make up for it -- presto, you get continued cruel tease and potential never ending orgasm possibilities.
Take it a step further (especially in the stories that feature chemicals or aphrodisiacs that "make you produce 10 times as much semen and prostate juice as before") ...maybe each time the teasemistress/master allows a spurt, or seemingly considerable amount to escape, but then tamps down on the ejaculation, the male's body is tricked into thinking that his balls and prostate were emptied by a full orgasm, and goes into overdrive to produce even more male jelly, so he's left in an even worse state than before...I could go on and on, but I won't...
<u>
And hey, since I'm guessing 99% of you creative cats out there have your own preferences that differ from mine, why not make your own donation to the cause? Weigh in on whether I'm onto something with my observations, or just full of it. Or, put out some other ways to ensure an explosive finale to tease stories...either way, we all benefit...</u>
Let me quickly sidestep the whole "shouldn't a teasing and denial story just end as a tease" debate by saying, different strokes for different folks. I'm sure others have equally valid reasons for ending their stories with the male in torment, but right now, I'm just interested in discussing stories that end with the male getting to come.
Maybe that seeming conflict between teasing, and letting someone get off is what makes so many of the excellent stories I've read on this site often seem like letdowns.Obviously, I'm not posting and reading here because my idea of a good fuck is 20 minutes of activity composed of vanilla foreplay, followed by precisely timed simultaneous orgasm, accomplished missionary style, but I PERSONALLY think that teasing stories, on average, would be better if they end with orgasm. Let's be honest -- why do 99% of the readers and writers of these stories read and write, if not to get off eventually...Yes, I recognize a lot of people really do prefer a maximally teased and orgasm free lifestyle, and again, I commend those who actually attain such goals, but for most of us mere mortals, we settle somewhere in between. (Again, that last sentence was in no way mocking -- I really do admire people who do extreme denial, I'm just saying that most people just don't have the time or energy or singlemindedness to get it done).
Okay, I'm getting off topic here, and doing exactly what i was trying to avoid -- debating about which type of story is better, though in my defense , all I'm putting out there are my own preferences. Just like I'm staunchly hetero, but one of the happiest days in my life was that recent supreme court decision that overturned sodomy laws...(and not just because I want another reason to encourage my girlfriend to have more equal opportunity anal sex)...Again, trying to avoid flaming, not start it....so...
Back to relevancy. Often, the best tease stories that keep me on the edge of my chair throguhout the long and delicious teasing phase, just sputter out when they finally come to the cumming phase. Maybe by the time you write all that buildup, the climax seems like an anticlimax. Or, maybe the best tease writers, are by necessity, mediocre when it comes to rendering the money scene, if you will, because they're so tease-oriented. To some degree, I also found the opposite to be true -- some of the least tease-heavy, but still tease-oriented stories I've read, have the most elaborate and well-written cum scenes.
Say every human is on a sexual spectrum -- on one end you have the pure denial folk, who'd really be happiest never cumming at all, and on the other end, the people who'd hump a piece of drywall in front of a hundred people to come one minute faster. If you're reading this, you, like me, probably know which end of the spectrum you fall on, and it ain't drywall humpin' (apologies to any genuine drywall fetishists out there). It makes sense that story writers would have to be better at the buildup or the finish, right?
For me, it seems like an excellent argument for collaboration between differently oriented writers (not seriously, but worth a shot, right)? Or maybe, there just aren't that many ways to convey massive quantities of sperm being expelled some enormous distance for a VERY long time, yadda yadda...so, in the interests of story enrichment as public service (mainly playing to some of my own kinks a bit), let me toss a few of my own ideas out there...to some degree, they don't fall completely within the "end with a whimper" or "end with a bang" categories -- a middle road, if you will...and of course, feel free to incorporate whatever you want into your own stories...
Since you're probably not going for 100% realism anyway, why not
-Allow the male to start ejaculating, but only a drop/short spurt at a time. To clarify, I realize that a lot of the stories I've read do this as a form of teasing anyway, but what I'm discussing is different. Usually, done as in-story teasing, this means the guy is allowed to spurt a bit, then completely shut down until he stops trying to ejaculate.
In my finale scenario, it's more of a "shake the soda bottle, cover with thumb, release momentarily, cover, release, and repeat scenario," so that an orgasm still occurs and lots of semen gets discharged.
This allows the possiblility of really, really drawn out orgasms (story-wise, I mean -- try at your own risk in real life), that are still tease-torture in a way, while pleasurable (if you want) for your 'hero.' If you want to play it another way, maybe the teaser lets out just enough semen each time, so the amount produced by the (presumably) oversexed and super-horny male in that time, is just enough to make up for it -- presto, you get continued cruel tease and potential never ending orgasm possibilities.
Take it a step further (especially in the stories that feature chemicals or aphrodisiacs that "make you produce 10 times as much semen and prostate juice as before") ...maybe each time the teasemistress/master allows a spurt, or seemingly considerable amount to escape, but then tamps down on the ejaculation, the male's body is tricked into thinking that his balls and prostate were emptied by a full orgasm, and goes into overdrive to produce even more male jelly, so he's left in an even worse state than before...I could go on and on, but I won't...
<u>
And hey, since I'm guessing 99% of you creative cats out there have your own preferences that differ from mine, why not make your own donation to the cause? Weigh in on whether I'm onto something with my observations, or just full of it. Or, put out some other ways to ensure an explosive finale to tease stories...either way, we all benefit...</u>